Federal agents were recently censored in a Chicago court after their personal information was made publicly available through a simple Google search. Shawn Byers, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Deputy Field Office Director, requested that his face be blurred during a court proceeding because his name, employment details, and location were already publicly listed on his LinkedIn profile.
During the hearing, government lawyers claimed that ICE agents are at risk of receiving threats due to their work. However, this was after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had previously condemned reporters for naming public officials involved in high-profile incidents, despite these individuals' names being widely available online.
Byers initially stated that he believed a $50,000 bounty had been placed on his head, along with $10,000 for his family members. However, after the judge asked about the specific threats directed at him, Byers seemed to walk back his claims, saying all senior ICE officials were at risk.
When the judge inquired whether these threats were specifically aimed at Byers, he replied that they were not just directed at him but also at other senior officials. Despite this, the judge decided to obscure Byers' face during the court proceedings, citing concerns for his safety.
However, it was later discovered that a simple Google search had revealed Byers' LinkedIn profile, which included his photo and location in Chicago. The judge acknowledged that her efforts to censor Byers were "silly" and expressed frustration with the government's use of this pretext to justify secrecy.
The incident highlights the government's attempt to silence critics and protect its officials from accountability by claiming they face extreme threats. However, this is often based on unsubstantiated claims, and judges need to be more vigilant in demanding evidence and transparency.
During the hearing, government lawyers claimed that ICE agents are at risk of receiving threats due to their work. However, this was after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had previously condemned reporters for naming public officials involved in high-profile incidents, despite these individuals' names being widely available online.
Byers initially stated that he believed a $50,000 bounty had been placed on his head, along with $10,000 for his family members. However, after the judge asked about the specific threats directed at him, Byers seemed to walk back his claims, saying all senior ICE officials were at risk.
When the judge inquired whether these threats were specifically aimed at Byers, he replied that they were not just directed at him but also at other senior officials. Despite this, the judge decided to obscure Byers' face during the court proceedings, citing concerns for his safety.
However, it was later discovered that a simple Google search had revealed Byers' LinkedIn profile, which included his photo and location in Chicago. The judge acknowledged that her efforts to censor Byers were "silly" and expressed frustration with the government's use of this pretext to justify secrecy.
The incident highlights the government's attempt to silence critics and protect its officials from accountability by claiming they face extreme threats. However, this is often based on unsubstantiated claims, and judges need to be more vigilant in demanding evidence and transparency.
. I don't know if I believe the whole thing, though. Maybe he just wanted an excuse to sit in court with his face blurred 
.
.
. We need more transparency and less secrecy around our officials' personal info. It's time to shine a light on their actions, not hide behind some baseless fear 
.
. I mean, come on, a simple Google search? That's like hidin' your face from someone who's walkin' down the street – you're just askin' for it, right? 
And now we got this whole thing about a $50k bounty? Give me a break, dude! It's all just a big ol' excuse to keep people in the dark 
. I swear, back in my day, we didn't need all these secrets and whatnot. We just spoke our minds and let the chips fall where they may 
. And you know what? The gov's not gonna stop 'em, no sir! They're just tryin' to silence us, like that Homeland Sec Noem lady said about those reporters 
. But we won't be silenced, bro! We'll keep on speakin' truth to power, even if it means wadin' through all this red tape 
.
. I mean, come on, a simple Google search reveals Byers' face and location? It's not like he was hiding his head under a hat or something 
. Judges need to stand up for transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to public officials who are supposed to be held to high standards of integrity 
. It's not about protecting these guys from threats, it's about silencing critics and maintaining power 
.
I mean, come on, $50k bounty and 10k for his fam? That's some wild stuff, even if it was likely just a bunch of BS to get the court censored. 
And now they're claiming their work puts them at risk of threats? 
The fact that the judge got censored in the first place is just ridiculous, and now they're saying her judgment was "silly"? 
It's all about control and secrecy here, not about protecting people from threats. 
. It's not fair to the public who has the right to know what's going on. The government is already so secretive about ICE and its agents, now they're using this kind of nonsense to keep us from holding them accountable. I mean, if a $50k bounty was really on his head, wouldn't that be news? 
It's just another example of governments trying to stonewall critics and cover their tracks.
. They can't just make stuff up or use it as an excuse to hide things from the public. The fact that Shawn Byers' LinkedIn profile was publicly available online and still managed to get his face blurred is pretty silly 
I'm all for keeping it real, but not when it comes at the cost of transparency and accountability. Judges need to be more chill (pun intended) about these claims and demand some actual evidence before going all cloak-and-dagger on us. 
It's just ridiculous that a simple Google search could blow this whole operation wide open... I guess you could say the government was trying to hide their "face" 
. I mean come on, if you're that worried about being named in public court, maybe you shouldn't have listed your name and face all over LinkedIn like it's a public diary 
. And don't even get me started on the whole "threats against senior officials" thing... if there are really that many people gunning for them, why can't they just use their own resources to protect themselves instead of relying on judges to censor everyone else? 
. When critics speak out, shouldn't they be protected from threats rather than having their faces censored? It feels like the government is using this tactic to silence anyone who dares to question them 
.
. I mean, seriously, if you're gonna claim that senior officials are under threat, shouldn't there be some actual proof or evidence to back it up? It just seems like they want to stonewall anyone who dares to question their actions or expose them for whatever they've done.
The judge was spot on when she called the censoring "silly"...
? anyway, it's not like byers wasn't already basically an open book online 
. judges need to step in and stop this secrecy nonsense 
anyhoo im worried about my own online presence rn, is it true that just having a profile on linkedin makes you public info or wut? 
ICE Deputy Director just got his face censored because he's too scared to deal with some threats... meanwhile, a simple Google search made him whole 
Please. The fact is, if your personal info is online, you're basically public property 
.
.