President Trump has signed an executive order aimed at curbing the influence of Wall Street firms on the US housing market. The move, titled "Stopping Wall Street from Competing with Main Street Homebuyers," seeks to prevent large institutional investors from buying up single-family homes that could otherwise be purchased by families.
The order instructs federal agencies, including the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission, to review potential antitrust violations in large-scale acquisitions of single-family homes. It also prioritizes enforcement actions against "coordinated vacancy and pricing strategies" by these institutions, which could give them an unfair competitive advantage in local rental markets.
Trump's administration has instructed lawmakers to draft legislation that would codify restrictions on such investments, with the goal of making housing more affordable for American families. The White House wants this limit to outlast Trump's term and be a lasting part of future administrations' policies.
However, some experts say that implementing a nationwide ban on single-family home acquisitions through executive action alone is not feasible. A law firm has pointed out that congressional legislation would be necessary to establish the legal basis for any federal ban.
The influence of Wall Street firms in the housing market has been significant since the 2008 financial crisis, when they snapped up distressed properties and converted them into rentals. While these firms own a relatively small portion of the nation's single-family housing stock β less than 1% β their concentration is often high in specific metro areas.
In fact, institutional investors control large clusters of homes in the fast-growing Sun Belt markets, such as Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, and Phoenix. These investors account for just 2% to 3% of single-family rental homes overall but have a disproportionate impact on certain local markets.
By contrast, mom-and-pop landlords own roughly 20% of single-family homes nationwide and accounted for about one-third of home purchases in the second quarter last year.
The order instructs federal agencies, including the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission, to review potential antitrust violations in large-scale acquisitions of single-family homes. It also prioritizes enforcement actions against "coordinated vacancy and pricing strategies" by these institutions, which could give them an unfair competitive advantage in local rental markets.
Trump's administration has instructed lawmakers to draft legislation that would codify restrictions on such investments, with the goal of making housing more affordable for American families. The White House wants this limit to outlast Trump's term and be a lasting part of future administrations' policies.
However, some experts say that implementing a nationwide ban on single-family home acquisitions through executive action alone is not feasible. A law firm has pointed out that congressional legislation would be necessary to establish the legal basis for any federal ban.
The influence of Wall Street firms in the housing market has been significant since the 2008 financial crisis, when they snapped up distressed properties and converted them into rentals. While these firms own a relatively small portion of the nation's single-family housing stock β less than 1% β their concentration is often high in specific metro areas.
In fact, institutional investors control large clusters of homes in the fast-growing Sun Belt markets, such as Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, and Phoenix. These investors account for just 2% to 3% of single-family rental homes overall but have a disproportionate impact on certain local markets.
By contrast, mom-and-pop landlords own roughly 20% of single-family homes nationwide and accounted for about one-third of home purchases in the second quarter last year.