New York City's borough presidents are finally wielding real power when it comes to housing decisions. Thanks to a recent ballot measure, these local leaders can now effectively veto Council-approved plans that they deem unsuitable. This shift marks a significant change in the city's review process, which had previously granted individual council members considerable influence over land use applications.
Under the new system, developers will be able to appeal to a three-member appeals board consisting of the mayor, city council speaker, and borough president if their proposal is rejected by the Council. If the appeals board approves the plan, it will become binding. This power shift could lead to more housing developments in areas currently lagging behind.
Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso is already using his newfound authority to guide decision-making on housing proposals. He has released a comprehensive rubric that assigns development goals for every neighborhood and considers reversing Council decisions blocking or modifying applications if they fall short of these targets, particularly in low-density districts like Bensonhurst and Midwood.
Reynoso believes this approach will help tackle the city's affordable housing crisis by concentrating efforts on areas producing few new homes. He also aims to depoliticize housing issues and base his votes on where homes are being built rather than their developers' interests.
Manhattan Borough President Brad Hoylman-Sigal plans to consider reversing decisions that block new housing in underproducing neighborhoods like Bayside and the western portion of the Rockaway Peninsula. He also expects this power to spur more housing applications, as developers may be incentivized to submit proposals they previously deemed unlikely.
The appeals board has sparked concerns among community groups and some City Council members, who worry it could undermine their ability to negotiate greater affordability and public benefits for communities. However, proponents argue that this system will help prevent the current situation where developers might pull applications before a formal review process even begins due to the dominance of local council members.
While borough presidents have long issued advisory opinions on land use proposals as part of the city's process, their new authority represents a significant shift towards taking more decisive action in housing decisions.
Under the new system, developers will be able to appeal to a three-member appeals board consisting of the mayor, city council speaker, and borough president if their proposal is rejected by the Council. If the appeals board approves the plan, it will become binding. This power shift could lead to more housing developments in areas currently lagging behind.
Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso is already using his newfound authority to guide decision-making on housing proposals. He has released a comprehensive rubric that assigns development goals for every neighborhood and considers reversing Council decisions blocking or modifying applications if they fall short of these targets, particularly in low-density districts like Bensonhurst and Midwood.
Reynoso believes this approach will help tackle the city's affordable housing crisis by concentrating efforts on areas producing few new homes. He also aims to depoliticize housing issues and base his votes on where homes are being built rather than their developers' interests.
Manhattan Borough President Brad Hoylman-Sigal plans to consider reversing decisions that block new housing in underproducing neighborhoods like Bayside and the western portion of the Rockaway Peninsula. He also expects this power to spur more housing applications, as developers may be incentivized to submit proposals they previously deemed unlikely.
The appeals board has sparked concerns among community groups and some City Council members, who worry it could undermine their ability to negotiate greater affordability and public benefits for communities. However, proponents argue that this system will help prevent the current situation where developers might pull applications before a formal review process even begins due to the dominance of local council members.
While borough presidents have long issued advisory opinions on land use proposals as part of the city's process, their new authority represents a significant shift towards taking more decisive action in housing decisions.