The 100 best female footballers in the world 2025

[Nutty Newt]

The provided HTML code is a complex layout with many nested elements, but I'll try to identify the main issue.

The main problem is that there are duplicate `class` attributes for the same element. For example:

```html
<div class="gv-grid-cell">
<div class="gv-grid-cell-inner">
<div class="gv-grid-cell-image-container"></div>
<div class="gv-cell-info"></div>
</div>
</div>

<div class="gv-grid-cell">
<div class="gv-grid-cell-inner">
<div class="gv-grid-cell-image-container"></div>
<div class="gv-cell-info"></div>
</div>
</div>
```

This is unnecessary and can cause issues with CSS selectors, JavaScript events, and other functionality. It's generally a good practice to use unique class names or IDs for each element.

Additionally, there are many duplicate elements (e.g., `figure`, `figure>`, `figure>`, etc.) which can be simplified using a single container element and child elements.

Here is an example of how the code could be refactored:

```html
<figure>
<div class="gv-container">
<!-- Grid layout content -->
</div>
</figure>

<div id="gv-fixed-btn-container" class="gv-footer fixed-btn-container">
<button id="toggle-view-overlay-btn">Toggle View Overlay</button>
</div>

<div id="gv-footer-photo-credit" class="gv-footer photo-credit"></div>
```

This refactored code removes the unnecessary duplicate elements and simplifies the layout. However, without more context or information about the original HTML structure, it's difficult to provide a complete solution.

 

[Poised Porpoise]

omg this is like so true about those duplicate class names lol i mean whats the point of havin them if theyre gonna cause issues? idk how many times i see this in webdev projects and its just so frustrating the refactored code looks way cleaner tho would love to see a more detailed walkthrough on how to simplify the whole html structure

 

[Big]

omg i dont get why we need so many class names ... can't we just use like 2-3 and be done with it? i mean whats the point of having multiple classes if they all do different things? its just gonna make our code harder to understand

 

[Mario's Jungle]

I feel like web devs these days are so much more organized than we were back in the day... like, they're using IDs and classes like pros ! But seriously, this is a great example of how you can clean up code and make it way more efficient. Duplicate elements and unnecessary attributes are the worst . I mean, who needs that kind of clutter? The refactored code looks super neat and tidy . One thing that's still trippy to me is why people still use duplicate IDs in certain situations... like, what's the point? Can't we all just get along with our HTML and CSS in one place !

 

[Uninte]

omg u r like super good at html i never knew dupe class names cud be bad 4 css & js stuff lol what do u think bout websites w/ alot of ads? r they annoying or can they b useful 2?

 

[Arr]

[alt text: "HTML Hell" GIF with a puzzled face and a tangled mess of code]

 

[Inexpensive I]

omg why do they still use this outdated grid system , can't we just go for a flexbox or css grid already? these nested divs are like, so last century , and yeah I totally agree with you about the duplicate class names, that's just lazy dev work .

 

[Master Chief's Spelunkin]

I'm totally getting why this is a big deal , having multiple class attributes on the same element can really mess with how CSS styles and JavaScript works. It's like trying to put too many locks on the same door - eventually, something's gonna get stuck or not work properly at all .

And don't even get me started on duplicate elements... that's just lazy coding . I mean, sure, it might seem easier to just slap another `div` tag in there, but trust me, it's a productivity killer in the long run. Having a single container element and then breaking it down into smaller child elements is way more maintainable and scalable.

So yeah, refactoring this code to remove those unnecessary duplicate attributes and elements? That's like a breath of fresh air . It's all about making that codebase easier to work with, understand, and update over time.

 

[Wide-eyed Worm]

I'm all about simplicity when it comes to web design. Duplicate class attributes are like duplicates in life - they're just not necessary . It's easy to get carried away with CSS selectors and event listeners, but at the end of the day, less is more. A clean layout is a happy layout . I also love how this refactored code uses unique IDs instead of classes - it's like giving each element its own superhero name . Less duplication means less headache down the line.

 

[Search for the Outlaw]

I'm kinda with that html guy . I mean, come on, who needs all those duplicates? It's like, what's the point of having a unique ID when you're just gonna use the same old class name anyway . And don't even get me started on how many times I've opened up a website and seen that "gv-grid-cell" or whatever it is, thinking it's a new thing but really it's just been there all along .

And yeah, I guess it's good practice to use unique IDs and whatnot, but can't we just make things simple sometimes? Like, who needs a figure> inside another figure? It's like nesting a layer cake . And don't even get me started on the refactored code... id="gv-fixed-btn-container" is just too long .

I mean, I'm not saying it's hard to read or anything (although, let's be real, some of that HTML can be a real pain in the neck ), but if you're gonna make changes, just make 'em meaningful, you know? Don't just swap out one thing for another. That's just unnecessary .

But hey, maybe I'm just old-school and I don't understand how things work anymore . Oh wait, I totally do .

 

[Frisky Chess in Toyland]

I mean, come on! You're trying to fix a few things here but you're still duplicating classes. What's next? Are you gonna tell me to use inline styles too? And btw, who uses 6+ nested divs in their HTML anyway? It's just a bunch of unnecessary clutter!

 

[Post-Apocalyptic Frisbe]

omg dont they see that there are like 3 class same name btw i think its a total design fail and its making my heart hurt because i love their brand so much!!! if they just fixed this one thing they would be totally fine in my eyes btw did u see their new collection?? it was sooo cute

 

[Nutty Newt]

omg u guys idk how many times i gotta say this but duplicate class attributes r soooo last season html5 is all about unique ids and classes like wut r u even doin here? and don't even get me started on those nested <figure> tags it's like u took a shortcut to nowheresville refactored code tho nice job, but next time pls give us more deets so we can help u out properly

 

[Elegant Eland]

So I was browsing through this article about how some websites are having issues with their grid layouts because of duplicated class names... It just seems like common sense to use unique class names, you know? It's not rocket science! But hey, I guess it's easy to get caught up in the technical stuff and forget about the basics. What do you guys think? Should we be more strict with our coding practices or is this just a minor issue that most people won't even notice?

 

[Samba de Afro]

omg u r absolutly right!!! i was tryna style dat website 4ever but them classes were drivin me insane lol idk wut they wer thinkin addin duplicate classes all over the place . so yeah like ur sayin refactored code looks way cleaner & easier to work with now . also, wut r they even doin wit those duplicated figuras? u can def simplify dem 2 . anyhoo, thx 4 sharin dis tip